Welcome

This is the official website and blog of Kay Kenyon, author of the science fiction epic, The Entire and The Rose. You can sign up for my mailing list, above, to receive a bi-monthly digest of my news and highlights of my blog topics. Of course, you can unsubscribe at any time.

bright-of-the-sky-free-on-kindle


The first book of The Entire and the Rose is now free on Kindle. Get it now.

twitter-bird Just sent out my newsletter, see whasup. via

What is the job of a storyteller?

This week I’m so pleased to have a guest blog from Brian McDonald. You can hear more from Brian at his blog and website.

Brian McDonald

Brian McDonald is an award-winning writer/director/producer who has worked in film, television and comic books and as a story consultant for both Pixar and Disney Feature Animation Studios. His award-winning short film White Face was sold to HBO and Cinemax and is used in corporations nation-wide as a diversity-training tool.  He scripted Abe Sapien: Drums of the Dead, the first Hellboy spin-off comic book, as well as Lost in Space and Predator – Strange Roux for Dark Horse Comics. He is also a teacher of story construction and the author of several books on the subject: Invisible Ink, The Golden Theme, Freeman and the forthcoming book Ink Spots.

—————————————-

Notice that in the title for this piece, I said storyteller rather than writer. That is because it is my belief that we use the wrong verb to describe what we do. Because we use the same word – writing – to describe both the physical action and the mental process, we are often confused about what our jobs are.

Many of us take our job to mean wordsmithing – the carefully crafted order and poetry of the words themselves. When people speak of “good writing” this is often what they mean.

But what about those who crafted stories before the written word? We know that stories existed long before anyone learned to write them down. We know that those cultures that were late in adopting written language had a long tradition of storytelling. Would you call people with no concept of writing “writers”?

In relatively recent times, silent movies made use of visual communication – early filmmakers told stories with pictures. Even today some storytellers who work in the medium of comic books sometimes discard words from their panels. On the subject of silent films, many of them were made up on the spot – Charlie Chaplin worked this way. Was he a writer? I would call him a storyteller.

Okay, so what, you may ask. Writer, storyteller, what’s the difference? The difference is that calling yourself a writer does not tell you what to do; calling yourself a storyteller gives you a direction – a mission.

I meet people everyday who are writers but don’t know what to write. They write pages upon pages of beautiful sentences about colorful characters. Or they write descriptions of exotic places. And they may do these things masterfully. Yet somehow they can never finish that novel or screenplay or whatever. Or, if they do finish, the material just lies flat somehow – it fails to move readers (or agents or publishers). Why? No story.

As a child I was interested in storytelling, but was a poor speller. What I found out was that teachers cared very little about the content of my writing, but a great deal about my misspellings. I became very familiar with red pen markings on my papers. I could have written, “It was the best of tymes it was the wusrt of tymes…” And out the red pen would have come with no mention at all of the content.

What I did not know was that I was dyslexic. In those days I was seen, at best, as “not applying myself.” At worst, and most often, I was understood as just not being very bright. The students who could spell were the golden children. It did not matter that they had no knack for telling interesting stories.

James L. Brooks, winner of 9 Emmys, who created the classic Mary Tyler Moore Show, Taxi, and others, is a terrible speller. The late Stephen J. Cannell, creator of more than 40 shows including the hit The Rockford Files, author of several best-selling novels, had terrible dyslexia.

I could mention more writers with such cognitive issues, but my point is that these guys were much better storytellers than spellers or wordsmiths. Storytelling is a noble craft that has been with us since before we had an alphabet. We should embrace it.

Now the world seems populated by folks who can “write well” but were never taught the first thing about how to tell a story. In fact, plot and storytelling are often seen as a lesser form of writing. Those writers who sell millions of books are often called bad writers by the wordsmiths.  But what these best-selling people are often good at is getting folks to turn pages, or tune into their television shows, or buy movie tickets.

Often when I ask students or other writers to define for me what a story is they have no definition at all. They sometimes fumble for one, since they have never been asked to think about it. But if you don’t know what a story is how can you set down to write one?

A story is the telling of a series of connected events leading to a conclusion.

The Golden Theme: How to Make Writing Appeal to the Highest Common Denominator

So? But that simple sentence tells you what to do. It says that your story must have a reason to be told – a theme. That’s what the conclusion is. In its most simple form, it is the moral of an Aesop fable. Every piece of the story is leading to that conclusion. All elements are there to support the author’s point.

This may sound elementary, but most people who call themselves writers act as if they do not know this. They try to put their colorful characters into interesting situations in the hope that a story will emerge. If that doesn’t happen, the manuscripts sits in a drawer or hard drive, unfinished and abandoned.

Why is having a point or theme important? Because only when you have something to say do people bother to listen.

In my book The Golden Theme I explore the idea of why human beings tell stories. Why does every culture on earth tell stories? Because stories teach us to survive. This is why stories need conflict – because conflict is what we need to learn how to survive. No one needs to learn how to survive the good times.

Survival can take many forms. It can mean actual physical survival: This is why people went in droves to see 127 Hours — a film about a young man trapped alone for days under rock and how he eventually severed his arm to escape.

But stories can turn on cultural or spiritual or emotional survival: Stories can tell us how to find love. We need stories to live. I don’t mean this in an artsy way. I mean in a practical way. We could not live without stories.

You are a storyteller. This is a noble and important job – treat it as such. Know what stores are and know what you want to say. If you are a wordsmith, all the better. It will only help. But be a storyteller first.

–Brian McDonald

 


Forces of antagonism

What stands in your main character’s way?

Maybe it’s a person whose goals clash with those of your protagonist. But sometimes it’s a situation. What we can call the force of antagonism.

It may be a societal restriction, a collapse of order, or a natural disaster. Many powerful stories rely on a force instead of a person. As you build your plot listen to the needs of your story. You shouldn’t force a villain into the mix.

Think of the great stories, and your personal favorites, that never offer an antagonist. Gone With the Wind is an example. No one specifically operates against Scarlett’s desire for mastery of her fate. You might say that Melanie is in the way of Scarlett’s romantic goal of Ashley Wilkes. But Melanie is merely a passive obstacle, forever married to the man of Scarlett’s dreams. The real dramatic question of Gone With the Wind is, Will Scarlett escape the ravages of war and find her place in the world? What stands in her way? It is the collapse of the South and the civil war. These are the forces of antagonism.

In The Rise of the Planet of the Apes, the opposition to Caesar (the protagonist) is actually humanity. A nice trick, that! Humanity’s subjugation of chimps stands in Caesar’s way.

Even a force must grow in power. But the force shouldn’t be static; it must change, or the plot can’t thicken. How do the forces of antagonism escalate in their impact? How does society push back against the protagonist when he tries to overcome prejudice, skepticism, or injustice? The more your hero grows in his willingness to confront, the more society will push back. If it is a story of the collapse of society, the downward spiral of the social order must grow precipitous. In Gone With the Wind, the civil war is at first a distant threat. By the midpoint we have the siege of Atlanta, and finally the decimation of the South through carpetbagging and economic collapse.

A force should be personalized. For a short segment of the film about Caesar the chimp, humanity’s evil role is personalized by the caretaker at the animal refuge. This focuses the general force of opposition and allows Caesar to interact with a specific enemy, at least for a time. In Gone With the Wind, Scarlett kills the union soldier intent on rape. It is a brief scene. But consider the power of it: He climbs the stairs of the ruined mansion at Tara (union soldiers have ravaged it), and Scarlett shoots him full in the face.

In Dan Simmons’s The Terror, the story of a disastrous nineteenth century sailing expedition in the arctic, the force of opposition is the cold and ice. Through starvation, exposure and animal predation, almost everyone on board the ship will die. Meanwhile we hope in vain for the northwest passage to thaw so that they can sail home. Simmons personalizes the extreme landscape in the shape of a monster, the essence of the wild landscape.

Or, digging deeper, we might say that the antagonist of this story is actually the hubris of the British navy and the false ambition to conquer the land. In these terms, we can better understand the final stand-off with the monster, in which the hero bows down to creature’s rightful rule.

Sometimes the force of antagonism is not overcome in any conventional way. This kind of story is not necessarily a tragedy. Sometimes the force of nature passes by, having wreaked its damage. We have endured, with lessons learned. And sometimes, it is a tragedy with an upbeat ending, if that is possible. An example is the apocolyptic tale where civilization is destroyed. But a few remain to start again.

The important thing to remember, as we use the writer’s toolkit (which contains the antagonist), is that such tools are strategies for creating drama. Modify them and let them suit your story.

 

 


Inner demons

You know that your major character is going to make or break your novel, so you’ve studied up. You’ve got a list of strengths and weaknesses, some defining quirks and maybe a back story to add credibility. Set to go, right?

No. Because so far the characteristics aren’t related to the story. Great characters aren’t built up from features, they are crafted with an eye to dramatic functions.

If you’re writing a story with even a smidgen of inner story (characterization) then you need to understand the role of weakness in character–otherwise known as  inner demons. These demons may be fear, ignorance, immaturity, crippling ambition, or any other negative impulse that places your major character at a disadvantage in doing what must be done. If  your hero is perfect on page one, he’s got nowhere to go (or grow) except to solve the plot problem. Read More »


The mistaken desire

Sometimes in stories what the major character wants is a big mistake. Not a mistake in storytelling terms, but in terms of what the character needs to learn. She firmly believes something is worth pursuing.

But she learns that she is wrong.

What she wants will be revealed as utterly false or superseded by a deeper, more urgent goal. In stories like these your basic story structure must be carefully handled so that you deliver a satisfying read, not a broken one.

There are several ways to play bait-and-switch with what the character wants:

Transcendence

This is when the character is placed in a unique position to sacrifice a personal goal for something greater. This may be a classic case of a moral dilemma, as in: Will the character give up a strong ambition for something larger than himself? In these stories, the ordinary–or the self-obsessed–person rises to heroic action.

Coming of age

Switching out the character’s driving desire is a classic strategy of coming of age stories. Your young character (or sheltered young adult) longs for something that is unworthy of them. (But not too unworthy, or it may be difficult to establish empathy with them early on.) She is naive in some basic, forgivable way.

Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz yearns for the excitement of distant lands. But in time what she desires is simply to go home. To put this approach in simpler terms, the character learns “what matters.”

The false ambition

The trick here is to make the first goal implicitly worthy. The story set up should provide a context within which we root for the protagonist’s goal. Make it a universal desire. But let other characters belittle the ambition. We establish empathy partly in reaction to mean-spirited obstacles. But the reader isn’t thinking deeply about the goal at this point–exactly the same position as the protagonist.

The character then embarks upon a journey of self discovery. And another goal gradually supplants the first. The character becomes someone capable of a larger vision.

As the story unfolds, more discerning characters cast doubt on the goal. But they aren’t to be trusted, perhaps, because they have their own agenda. The hero listens, but can’t give up the goal that has defined her. At this point the reader may well be ahead of the character. We know this is a fool’s errand. She does not.

This kind of story is tricky to plot. You’ll have important choices as to when the character intentionally abandons the false ambition. Plot point two, in film making terms, is a good place for a grand reversal. At this point, you must have a worthy goal lying in wait, a call to higher moral purpose that has been growing on the character. But let the reader still doubt whether the character can make the transition. This happens at the climax. The hero gives up the false desire and irrevocably acts on the greater one.

Some stories cry out for a bait-and-switch story goal. When handled with finesse, they can add an extra layer of interest to a character-driven story.

 

 

 

 


Best reads of the year

Books are my favorite gifts to give and receive. Here are my picks from the year in books.

Nonfiction

1776 – David McCullough

A stirring account of the most famous year in America. It’s an account you’ve never seen before, with intensely human close ups of General George Washington and those who marched with him-and against him. If you thought you didn’t like history, McCullough will change your mind.

Cleopatra: A Life – Stacy Schiff

Get past the mythology and be astonished that Cleopatra is not known for being a shrewd monarch and a much more interesting woman than the stereotyped seductress as (mostly) men have portrayed her. A luminous, fascinating work.

Story Engineering – Larry Brooks

Larry Brooks takes on story architecture and in doing so breaks open storytelling for beginners and mid-career writers alike. Look at your novel problems in dazzling clarity, learning what’s missing and why people notice.

Here is not a rigid template, but a classic blueprint. He lays out why the elements have to be there and how they create drama. You’ll still need to work your artistic magic to breathe life into your story–but you’ll be working smart and not floundering with a shapeless narrative that has lost its rhythm–and reader interest.

Fiction

Wolf Hall – Hilary Mantell

King Henry VIII’s court told from the viewpoint of the fascinating and complex Thomas Cromwell. This highly literary book is no seen-it-before costume drama, but a close up of the psyche of one man trying to navigate the court where a single mistake can mean death. A dense portrait of a man often glossed over in the usual film treatments.  Winner of the Man Booker prize.

Tongues of Serpents – Naomi Novik

Temeraire and Lawrence banished to Australia. If you haven’t tried this wonderful series, then you aren’t in love with the dragon Temeraire – yet. Start with the first book, His Majesty’s Dragon, and luxuriate in the inner and outer worlds of these fascinating characters trying to navigate war and class and a mutual devotion seldom seen in fiction.

The Brahms Deception  – Louise Marley

This intense read is a tightly-plotted time-travel story that plays with the idea of a love affair between Johannes Brahms and Clara Schumann. Historians from the future travel back in time on an ostensible musicology mission which soon turns dark and harrowing. Reminiscent of Willis’s Doomsday Book, this story offers a dramatic plot and fabulous historical detail.

Troubled Waters – Sharon Shinn

Shinn’s latest fantasy world ruled by five elemental signs and shot though with back-stabbing court intrigues. This is a delightful coming-of-age story that brings a young woman from pawn to power while delivering a fine romance. Zoe Ardelay’s primal power comes from water, and most readers try to figure out their own essence. See Shinn’s website for help in determining yours.


It ain’t solitary confinement

I’ll be at World Fantasy in San Diego this week (see my schedule at bottom), and will be looking to do some business. But mostly, I’m going to see friends.

I hope, having said that, that I will not lose my membership in Introverts Anonymous.

Thing is, in this business you need a little help from your friends. Writing is a solitary endeavor, but it’s not solitary confinement. It’s hard to have a big success in this field, but working harder won’t necessarily make that happen. Actually, it’s far likelier to happen if you build a support group to help you stay balanced and achieve perspective.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that to be a writer you mostly have to hunker down and write. You do, of course, have to write. But you also have to survive the slings and arrows of a very tough business. For this, there is nothing like a friend.

If possible, a very close friend. A best pal can anchor you in the writing life, providing:

  • Advice and problem-solving.
  • A friendly ear when one hits bottom.
  • Someone who’ll applaud you without (too much) envy when a success comes.
  • A  companion for conferences and signings.
  • A mirror to your own writing life, to give perspective.
  • Source of laughs, gossip, and wisdom.
  • Dependable guerrilla marketing and cross-promotions with you. Read More »